Legal Opinion

Teale v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1976No. 48645PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

The dominant question in this case is whether a civil action for damages exists for a violation of the statute which the parties refer to as the “Age Discrimination Act.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 48, pars. 881-887.) The circuit court of Cook County dismissed a complaint based primarily upon an alleged violation of that statute, and the plaintiff’s appeal was brought to this court under Rule 302(b).

The statute was enacted in 1967. Its full title is “An Act to prohibit unjust discrimination in employment because of age and providing for penalties.” Section 1 contains the following legislative…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Heimgaertner v. Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Johnson v. United States Steel Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Mein v. Masonite CorporationIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Sherman v. Field ClinicAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API