Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States Steel Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 4, 1964PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The plaintiff’s amended declaration is in five counts. The first, second, third, and fifth in so far as they are the same, allege the following: The plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a turn superintendent. The defendant discharged the plaintiff when he was sixty-three years of age, without cause, in violation of G. L. c. 149, § 24A (inserted by St. 1937, c. 367, § 2). This was done with the intention of depriving the plaintiff of certain benefits. At the time of the discharge there was work available for the plaintiff and he was capable of performing it.

Counts 1, 2, 3, and 5 differ…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parker v. BarnardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Berdos v. Tremont & Suffolk MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Mezullo v. MaletzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  4. Aldworth v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Gallagher v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Melley v. Gillette Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Fawcett v. G. C. Murphy & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Sands Regent v. ValgardsonNevada Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API