Legal Opinion

Sansom Reporting, Inc. v. Feiner, Klaris & Curtis

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 20, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants, members of a law firm, ordered from plaintiff daily copy of the minutes of a hearing before the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with a matter involving their client. Although the order blank was signed by a member of the firm in individual name it identified the case and included the name of the client. There is no showing that the attorneys intended to be personally liable for these minutes and, in these circumstances, under established law they are not responsible. (For the general rule of the law of agency see Mencher v. Weiss, 306 N. Y. 1,4 and cases there…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mencher v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christensen, O'Connor, Garrison & Havelka v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Christensen, O'Connor, Garrison & Havelka v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API