Legal Opinion

Christensen, O'Connor, Garrison & Havelka v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1982No. 48261-6Published

1Opinion of the Court

97 Wn.2d 764 (1982)

649 P.2d 839

CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, GARRISON & HAVELKA, Appellant,

v.

THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 48261-6.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

August 19, 1982.

Davis, Wright, Todd, Riese & Jones, by C. James Judson, Edward J. Larson, and Daniel M. Waggoner, for appellant.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Karen Elledge and Jeffrey Goltz, Assistants, for respondent.

DORE, J.

Plaintiff patent attorneys seek reversal of the trial court's summary judgment in favor of the Department of Revenue. Such summary judgment of dismissal, in essence, provided that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John H. Sellen Construction Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Christensen, O'Connor, Garrison & Havelka v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Coachman, Inc. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  4. Sansom Reporting, Inc. v. Feiner, Klaris & CurtisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API