Legal Opinion

Horkheimer v. Horkheimer

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1929No. 6320PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

In this suit the plaintiff obtained a divorce a mensa on the ground of desertion. The defendant filed a cross-bill alleging neglect, cruelty and desertion, and asking a like divorce. This case is singularly free from the sordid details which so often encumber divorce records. The story is simply one of a filial tie which was stronger than conjugal duty. True, there is ‘ ‘ a woman in the case ’ ’. But the discord wrought by that woman was due to overweaning maternal instincts and not to the wiles of a wanton.

These parties were married in June, 1926, and came shortly afterwards…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Goff v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Reynolds v. ReynoldsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Hall v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hoffhines v. HoffhinesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ball v. BallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hughes v. HughesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hatten v. HattenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Koch v. KochNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Watson v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API