Legal Opinion
United States v. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1979No. Nos. 77-1271, 77-1272, 77-1281, 77-1282, 77-1338 and 77-1619PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Searcy Baker Andrews, Charles Johnson, Anthony Martin, Lewis Dixon, Nolan Hall and Stephen Davenport appeal from their convictions for violations of federal laws relating to the distribution and possession of illegal drugs.
Defendants Andrews, Johnson, Hall and Martin were convicted after a two-day trial before the court, the primary evidence considered by the court being facts stipulated to by the prosecution and the defense. Defendants Davenport and Dixon were convicted after a jury trial. All of the convictions arose from the same set of events, and the cases have been…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- United States v. Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. SouthardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Hilda Escobar De BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Mark PrieskornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Edward Ford, Robert Little, John Felix, Solomon Johnson, Phillip Usquiano, Marcus Thompson, E. Dene ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.