Legal Opinion

Vincenti v. Kammer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1948No. [No. 59, October Term, 1947.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrason, J.

This is a proceeding to specifically enforce a.contract for the sale of leasehold properties. .The .bill of complaint was filed on October 24, 1946, in the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City, by Arthur C. Kammer, plaintiff (appellee) against Della Vincenti and Rudolph Vincenti, her husband, and Eleanora Vincenti defendants (appellants) . The latter, who is a daughter of Della Vincenti, has since married and is now Eleanora Vincenti Rose.

The bill, in substance, alleges • that Della Vincenti owned two improved leasehold properties known as 2119 and 2121 Maryland Avenue; that she signed a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gill v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Doering v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Scarlett v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  4. Budacz v. FradkinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  5. Kaufmann v. AdalmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  2. Chapman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. String v. Steven Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Aler v. PlowmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Silver Holding Corp. v. SheelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API