Legal Opinion
The Antoinetta
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 8, 1943No. 65 of 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
Acting on the contention that the vessel “Antoinetta” (documented under the laws of the Government of Italy and Italian-owned) had been sabotaged while in the territorial waters of the United States, and further that the vessel had been used as a place of resort by persons conspiring to commit offenses against the United States, the United States of America on July 14, 1941, filed its libel seeking to declare the forfeiture of the “Antoinetta”.
*150Subsequently, on July 31, 1941, one Giovanni Lena, master of the vessel, filed formal claim to it, intervening for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Ex Parte KawatoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mechanics Universal Joint Co. v. CulhaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. 422 Casks of WineSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- United States v. the AntoinettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Clark v. Continental Nat. Bank of Lincoln, Neb.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1949
- In re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1955
- In re the Estate of LustgartenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.