Firestone Laser & Manufacturing LLC v. Bristow

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION FIRESTONE LASER & MANUFACTURING CASE NO. 4:21-CV-01772-AMK LLC, Plaintiff, MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMANDA M. KNAPP vs. MICHAEL BRISTOW, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant. Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Firestone Laser & Manufacturing, LLC (“Firestone”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (ECF Doc. 52.) Defendant Michael Bristow (“Mr. Bristow”), proceeding pro se, did not file a brief in opposition the Motion. For the reasons set forth below, the…