Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Mintz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 24, 2025No. 21ag/24Published

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. David B. Mintz, AG No. 21, September Term, 2025, Opinion by Booth, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – DISBARMENT Respondent David B. Mintz violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (competence), 1.3 (diligence), 1.4(a) and (b) (communication), 1.5(a) (fees), 1.6 (diligence), 1.16(a) (declining or terminating representation), 3.2 (expediting litigation), 3.4(c) (fairness to opposing party and attorney), 8.1(b) (bar admission and disciplinary matters), and 8.4(a), (c), and (d) (misconduct). The violations occurred in connection…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KremerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. Attorney Grievance v. Smith-ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API