Legal Opinion
Espada 2001 v. New York City Campaign Finance Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Saxe, J.
This CPLR article 78 proceeding raises the issue of whether penalties may be properly assessed by respondent New York City Campaign Finance Board against a candidate and the campaign treasurer as well as the campaign committee itself for various violations of the New York City campaign finance laws. Supreme Court held that penalties for certain violations could properly be imposed on the campaign committee only and that *59penalties for other violations could be imposed on the candidate as well, but that the treasurer could be liable for penalties only if he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Partnership 92 LP v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- New York City Campaign Finance Board v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- New York City Council v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- State v. UzzilliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fields v. New York City Campaign Finance BoardNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- Belair Care Ctr., Inc. v. Cool Insuring Agency, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2017
- Chin v. New York City Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Chin v. New York City Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- New York City Campaign Finance Board v. MahadeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011