Legal Opinion

New York City Campaign Finance Board v. Mahadeo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

In this action to recover civil penalties from defendants (see Campaign Finance Act of 1965, codified at Administrative Code of City of NY § 3-701 et seq.), defendant Trotman’s argument, that the Board lacked jurisdiction to impose statutory penalties on the defendants because the defendants never received any public matching funds from the Board and because the Board determined, before penalties were imposed, that defendants were not qualified to receive public matching funds, is unpreserved as it is raised for the first time on appeal. Were we to reach this argument, we would find it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Lewis Tree Serv., Inc. v. Fire Dep't of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Espada 2001 v. New York City Campaign Finance BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API