Legal Opinion

United States v. Adney

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 29, 2005No. ARMY 20030048PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCHENCK, Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of carnal knowledge, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for fourteen months, and reduction to Private El, but disapproved the adjudged forfeiture of all pay and allowances. This case is before the court for review under Article 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

Appellate defense counsel assert two assignments…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  2. United States v. GorskiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. EmminizerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  4. United States v. WelkerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  5. United States v. FaganCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Specialist JOHN A. GUNDERMAN, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  2. United States v. Second Lieutenant JAVIER O. MORALEZArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  3. United States v. Specialist JOSHUA A. LUNDYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  4. United States v. Staff Sergeant JOSHUA D. SMITHArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API