Daly v. Testo (In Re Carrozzella)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON TRUSTEE’S COMPLAINT FOR CONTRIBUTION AND OTHER RELIEF
ALBERT S. DABROWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The captioned adversary proceeding presents another chapter in the sordid history of the financial dealings of Attorney John A. Carrozzella (hereafter, “Carrozzella” or the “Debtor”). These Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law assume familiarity with a pattern of fraud perpetrated by Carrozzella upon scores of clients and other lay-persons over a period spanning two decades. See e.g., Daly v. Biafore (In re Carrozzella & Richardson), 237 B.R.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Providence Electric Co. v. Sutton Place, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Sender v. SimonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Stewart v. Tunxis Service CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re CollierUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- In re SpenlinhauerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- In re SpenlinhauerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Daly v. Testo (In re Richardson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2001