Legal Opinion

Beaurline v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 29, 1968No. 340PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Justice.

This is a suit for recovery of a real estate commission by the plaintiff Prescott M. Smith. The defendants, A. W. Beaur-line, L. A. Beaurline and Mathilda Beaur-line, hereafter referred to as “appellants”, answered and filed a cross-action alleging in effect, malicious prosecution, and seeking thereby actual and exemplary damages against the plaintiff and a third party defendant, Frank Theser. Summary judgment was granted by the trial court awarding plaintiff his commission and denying appellants any relief on their cross-action against plaintiff and Theser.

Appellants…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Salado College v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. JC Penney Company v. GilfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Sullivan v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Morris v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Rippetoe v. DwyerTexas Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. K-Mart No. 4195 v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Smart v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Hooper v. Morgan Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Rob Jennings, III and El Veleno, Ltd. v. Susan Jennings, Tres Mujeres, Ltd., and Pamela J. Person, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API