Beaurline v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Justice.
This is a suit for recovery of a real estate commission by the plaintiff Prescott M. Smith. The defendants, A. W. Beaur-line, L. A. Beaurline and Mathilda Beaur-line, hereafter referred to as “appellants”, answered and filed a cross-action alleging in effect, malicious prosecution, and seeking thereby actual and exemplary damages against the plaintiff and a third party defendant, Frank Theser. Summary judgment was granted by the trial court awarding plaintiff his commission and denying appellants any relief on their cross-action against plaintiff and Theser.
Appellants…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Salado College v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- JC Penney Company v. GilfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Sullivan v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Morris v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Rippetoe v. DwyerTexas Supreme Court · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- K-Mart No. 4195 v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Smart v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Hooper v. Morgan Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Rob Jennings, III and El Veleno, Ltd. v. Susan Jennings, Tres Mujeres, Ltd., and Pamela J. Person, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021