Legal Opinion

JC Penney Company v. Gilford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 30, 1967No. 15121PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is a suit for damages. The cause of .action is based on malicious prosecution or, alternatively, abuse of process. The trial was to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,500.00 for actual damage, but no punitive damages were allowed. Findings of fact and conclusions of law- were filed by the trial judge.

The more important questions presented by this appeal as to the cause of action based on malicious prosecution are: (1) whether the evidence shows as a matter of law that appellant had probable cause to instigate criminal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sebastian v. CheneyTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Ramsey v. ArrottTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Blackstock v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Reed v. LindleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Meyer v. ViereckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton, S.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Martin v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. EskenaziCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Warner Bros. Entm't, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Detenbeck v. Koester, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API