JC Penney Company v. Gilford
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
This is a suit for damages. The cause of .action is based on malicious prosecution or, alternatively, abuse of process. The trial was to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,500.00 for actual damage, but no punitive damages were allowed. Findings of fact and conclusions of law- were filed by the trial judge.
The more important questions presented by this appeal as to the cause of action based on malicious prosecution are: (1) whether the evidence shows as a matter of law that appellant had probable cause to instigate criminal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sebastian v. CheneyTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Ramsey v. ArrottTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Blackstock v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Reed v. LindleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Meyer v. ViereckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton, S.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Martin v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. EskenaziCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Warner Bros. Entm't, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Detenbeck v. Koester, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.