Kerr v. Reece
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Oreenioood District Court. Action brought by Reece against Kerr, to reeoyer $1,500' for the services of plaintiff’s thorough-bred sorrel stallion named “Alhambra” during the seasons of 1879 and 1880. Trial at the May Term, 1881, of "the district court, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $870 and’costs. The-defendant brings the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an action by defendant in error (plaintiff below) against plaintiff in.error (defendant below),, to recover $1,500 for the services of a stallion. The first assignment of error is, that the court overruled the motion of' defendant below to compel the plaintiff to make his petition more definite and certain.- As the' motion did not point out any defects in the petition, nor suggest in what respects such petition ought to be made more definite and certain, and as-*339the petition upon its face stated facts sufficient to constitute a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilson v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Joseph v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Wolfley v. RisingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- City of Wyandotte v. NobleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Norton v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cockrell v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Kuchler v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Sharum v. SharumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Ambrose v. ParrottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Henry v. Gulf Coast Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916