Ambrose v. Parrott
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Neosho District Court. Action brought by Parrott against Ambrose and another, to recover a personal judgment on three promissory notes, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the same. The facts appear in the opinion. At the April Term, 1882, of the district court, the plaintiff had judgment against the defendants, who bring the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by Sarah Parrott, defendant in error (plaintiff below), against D. C. Ambrose and Mary E. Ambrose, plaintiffs in error (defendants below), to recover a personal judgment on three promissory notes, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the same. Only one of the notes was due, according to the terms of the notes, when the action was commenced, but the other two notes were alleged to be due by virtue of a stipulation contained in the mortgage, providing in substance that in case of default in payment of any…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilmore v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Thayer v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1845
- Andrews v. AlcornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Swenson v. Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- McDowell v. LloydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cockrell v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Kuchler v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- City of Chickasha v. LooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Southern Surety Co. v. WaitsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Sharum v. SharumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.