Legal Opinion
Brady v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 13, 1989No. Civ. N-87-413(AHN)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SET OFF DISABILITY BENEFITS RECEIVED BY THE PLAINTIFF
NEVAS, District Judge.
Robert Brady brought this action against the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. Sections 51 et seq., claiming damages for injuries he sustained while working as a general foreman for Amtrak. A jury found Amtrak liable and awarded Mr. Brady damages in the amount of $1,581,116. The court stayed the entry of judgment pending the disposition of the issues raised by the instant motion. 1 For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rick E. Clark, & Cross-Appellee v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a Corporation, & Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Edward W. Blake v. Delaware and Hudson Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Alan R. Folkestad, and Cross-Appellee v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- John W. Russo v. Matson Navigation Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Perry v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. John T. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Laird v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Manes v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
- Snipes v. Chicago, Central & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Fogg v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.