Harris v. Kerr
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Washington county, Crosby, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtG-ilfillan, C. J.
Action to recover the price of a horse sold, and also for the board of the horse. The answer denied the allegations in the complaint as to the board of the horse, and, as a defence against the claim for the price, alleged that, at the purchase, plaintiff made certain representations as to the soundness of the horse, and warranted it to be as he represented, and alleged the falsity of the representations, and, in effect, that the horse was not as warranted. No damages for the breach of warranty were alleged, and the allegations of the answer were insufficient to make a charge for false and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Farmer v. CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Kelly v. FahrneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Knowles v. SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Konkel v. FortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.