Murphy v. New York Central Railroad
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalano, J.
This is a motion for “ an Order requiring and compelling Robert F. McGfraw and Frederick Hein, witnesses, to answer certain questions, as more fully explained in the affidavit of Charles H. Dougherty, upon their examination before trial in the above entitled action ”.
Said affidavit states, in effect, that at the commencement of the deposition it was stipulated that “ all objections to questions except as to the form of the question be reserved to the time *250of the trial; ” ‘ that in the case of two witnesses, Robert F. McGraw (see deposition, pp. 28-33) and Frederick Hein (see deposition, pp.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Waldele v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Guenther v. Ridgway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Kleinfield v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Brown v. BedellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
3Cited by1 opinion
- Iaconno v. RappNew York Supreme Court · 1982