Legal Opinion

Iaconno v. Rapp

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John S. Lockman, J.

Motion by plaintiff for further examinations before trial (EBT) of defendants Walter J. Rapp, Jr., Walter J. Rapp, Sr., and Joseph Moreo is granted as to defendants Walter J. Rapp, Sr., and Joseph Moreo and denied as to defendant Walter J. Rapp, Jr.

During the examinations of each of these defendants questions posed by plaintiff were objected to by a defendant. The defendants refused to avail themselves of the availability of the Special Term, Part II, Justice for a ruling on their objections insisting instead that a written application be made. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API