Legal Opinion

Brown v. Bedell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The questions to which objections were made appear to us to be included within the scope of the examination of the respective defendants ordered. However, the questions numbered 89 to 92, inclusive, are improper as to form. Such objection is properly taken upon the examination. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 305.) The other questions call for matters clearly relevant. Objections to these for incompetency and immateriality must be reserved for the trial, where the rights of the respective defendants may be preserved. (Guenther v. Ridgway Co., 159 App. Div. 74.)

The order appealed from should be modified by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Guenther v. Ridgway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kearns Coal Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Kleinfield v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. Murphy v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API