Legal Opinion
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. v. NAILEEN TRANSPORT CORP.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 19, 2021No. 2:21-cv-14002Unknown
1Opinion
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 21-cv-14002 v. OPINION NAILEEN TRANSPORT CORP., et al., Defendants. John Michael Vazquez, U.S.D.J. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank, N.A.’s unopposed motion for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b). D.E. 10. The Court reviewed all submissions made in support of the motion and considered the motion without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Local Civil Rule 78.1(b). For the reasons…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Wachovia Bank, National Ass'n v. SchmidtSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Comdyne I, Inc. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.