Legal Opinion

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co v. O'Donnell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1904No. 13,671PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Lincoln Frost, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Letton, C.

This action was brought by Murty D. O’Donnell, by his next friend, Mary O’Donnell, against the Chicago, Roclc Island & Pacific Railway Company, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon him while passing along Vine street in the city of Lincoln on his way home from school. For a statement of the case see O’Donnell v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., 65 Neb. 612. After a judgment for the defendant error proceedings were prosecuted to this court, whereupon the cause was reversed and remanded to the district court. After the cause was remanded the plaintiff filed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. CrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. O'Donnell ex rel. O'Donnell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Behrens v. GottulaNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Pulliam v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Crawford v. HamNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bunselmeyer v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hamilton v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API