Legal Opinion

Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. Wright

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1896No. 6480PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

This is a rehearing of Omaha & R. V. R. Co. v. Wright, reported in 47 Neb., 886, where will be found a sufficient statement of the facts. Wright and others alleged in their petition: The railway company, “by its agents and employes, while running at a high rate of speed, carelessly and negligently, without using due caution, ran the engine and train of cars connected therewith and attached thereto over and upon the cattle of these plaintiffs.” “That the said defendant, carelessly and negligently, by its employes and servants, in operating said train ran their said engine and train…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sullivan v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. Clark v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. GrablinNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KelloggNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. OysterNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Behrens v. GottulaNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. HagbladNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KelloggNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API