Legal Opinion
In Re Establishing Certain Territorial Electric Boundaries Within the State of South Dakota
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1982No. 13506, 13508PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNN, Justice.
This case involves the establishment of territorial boundaries for electric utilities in the Aberdeen vicinity. It is before us on appeal for the second time, and we refer to our prior decision for a further statement of the facts. See Matter of Certain Territorial Elec. Boundaries, Etc., 281 N.W.2d 72 (S.D.1979), hereinafter cited as Aberdeen Vicinity-
In Aberdeen Vicinity, we determined that the electric lines in the entire disputed area were intertwined. We remanded the matter, therefore, to the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to determine service area boundaries in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Truman Outland v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Delta Airlines, Inc., Air Line Pilots Association, International, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Anchor Line Limited v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Benmar Transport and Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dail v. South Dakota Real Estate CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Helms v. Lynn's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Fullmer v. State Farm Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LohnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Loewen v. Hyman Freightways, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.