Legal Opinion

Keystone Co. v. Brooks

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1909PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Webster County. Action by the Keystone Lumber & Mining Company against Arthur Brooks. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

By deed 16th June, 1900, 'in consideration of $23,000, half in • cash, the Keystone Lumber and Mining Company conveyed to George W. Barricklow certain timber by the language, “does • *513grant unto the party of the second part all kinds of timber standing or being on all that certain tract of land lying and being in the county of Webster in the State of West Virginia on the waters of Laurel creek and Birch riven, and bounded and described as follows." Containing 3986 acres., more or less. Next comes the clause, “Together with the right to second party to enter upon and use the land…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. C. W. Zimmerman Mnfg. Co. v. DaffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Williams v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Null v. ElliottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hicks v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Kelly v. Rainelle Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. R. M. Cobban Realty Co. v. DonlanMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Williams v. McCartyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hill v. VencillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API