Legal Opinion

Williams v. Flood

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1886PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Error to Berrien. (Smith, J.) Case for conversion of timber. Defendants James H. and. Thomas P. Flood bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Error to Berrien. (Smith, J.) Case for conversion of timber. Defendants James H. and. Thomas P. Flood bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion. The extensions were within the statute of frauds: Abell v. Munson, 18 Mich. 306; Cook v. Bell, Id. 393; and, if a valid license, it was terminated by the deed to appellants: Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co., 41 Mich. 466; Drake v. Wells, 11 Allen, 141; Carter v. Harlan, 6 Md. 20; Bridges v. Purcell, 1 Dev. & Bat. 492; Wescott v. Delano, 20 Wis. 514; Mendenhall v. Klinck, 51 N. Y. 246; Prince v. Case, 10 Conn. 382; Dark v. Johnston, 55 Penn. St.…

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This is an action of trespass on the case, to recover the value of certain standing and down timber on a parcel of land described in plaintiff’s declaration.

On the sixteenth day of September, 1882, James Flood, who is an uncle of the remaining defendants, was the owner in fee of the laud, and on that day, by a writing under seal, sold to the plaintiff "all the standing timber from and over the size of nine inches in diameter on the stump, situated, standing, or being ” upon the land in question.

The instrument contained the following clause:

“Giving and granting the said Henry W. Williams the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owens v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Abell v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Daniels v. BaileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Russell v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Green v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. C. W. Zimmerman Mnfg. Co. v. DaffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Bunch v. Elizabeth City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Hawkins v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Hodges v. BuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Elmonte Investment Co. v. Schafer Bros. Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API