Legal Opinion
Niemann v. Badger Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided January 12, 1988No. 87-0277PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
David C. Niemann (Niemann) appeals from an order enforcing the reducing clause under the uninsured motorist section of his policy with Badger Mutual Insurance Company (Badger Mutual). Badger Mutual cross-appeals from that part of the order which declares void the "regular use” exclusionary clause under the uninsured provision. We hold that the reducing clause and the "regular use” exclusionary clause violate sec. 632.32(4)(a), Stats.
FACTS
The facts are not in dispute. This appeal arises out of an automobile accident in which Niemann was injured. Niemann was a passenger in a car driven by Tony…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nicholson v. Home Insurance Companies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Federated American Insurance v. RaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Jacobson v. Implement Dealers Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Brennan v. Branch 24 of the Circuit Court of Milwaukee CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
3Cited by14 opinions
- Employers Health Insurance v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Blazekovic v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. BangSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Hornick v. Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Clark v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.