Legal Opinion

Ianire v. University of Delaware

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 29, 1969PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIFFERATO, Judge.

The University of Delaware (“University”) is the defendant in a negligence action brought by the estate and by the widow of Ronald Ianire. The complaint alleges that Ianire was employed by the Diamond State Telephone Company (“Diamond”) ; that he was electrocuted while working on University’s premises in connection with certain telephone services contracted for by University; and that Diamond is currently making Workmen’s Compensation payments to his widow. The negligence charged consists of failure to provide a business invitee with a reasonably safe place to work, and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Kaplan v. Merberg Wrecking CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  5. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Seaboard Coast Line RR Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Montgomery County v. Valk Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Clark v. Teeven Holding Co., Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
  4. Gentry v. Wilmington Trust CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  5. New Zealand Kiwifruit Marketing Board v. City of WilmingtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API