State ex rel. Washington State Sportsmen's Council, Inc. v. Coe
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
Relators invoke the original jurisdiction of this court in mandamus to compel the secretary of state to accept the filing of an initiative petition to the legislature, which filing was refused by the secretary of state because it did not contain the number of signatures required by the thirtieth amendment to the Washington constitution.
Until December 6, 1956, the seventh amendment to the state constitution, the facilitating statute and amendments, Laws of 1913, chapter 138, p. 418 (Rem. Rev. Stat., §§ 5397 to 5428 [cf. RCW 29.79]), required only fifty thousand signatures on such petitions. In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Eitel v. LindheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Jelm v. JelmOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Dawson v. TobinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Pinkham v. . MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. Continental West, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BelgardeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Citizens Against Mandatory Bussing v. PalmasonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Rix v. AsadoorianSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
- Department of Revenue v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.