Legal Opinion

People v. Hodnett

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions from circuit court, Allegany county. Action by Patrick J. Sutley, as assistant to the dairy commissioner, in the name of the people, against Edward Hodnett, to recover a penalty. Plaintiff moves for a new trial on exceptions ordered to be heard in the general term in the first instance, the entry of the judgment being in the mean time suspended.

1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.

This action was brought by Patrick J. Sutley, as assistant to the New York state dairy commissioner, in the name of *810the people, to recover of the defendant a penalty of $100 for a violation of the provisions of the Laws of 1885, c. 183, § 3. It is charged that the defendant on the 24th day of June, 1890, supplied to a cheese factory In the town of Hume, Allegany county, milk which was adulterated with water, and from which the cream had been taken, and the strippings withheld. The verdict was for the defendant. Upon the trial the court permitted the defendant, his wife, and son to testify,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
  3. People v. EddyNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BeamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. People v. BeamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. People v. SalisburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. People v. FerrarisSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1909
  5. People v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API