Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Ferraris

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided December 24, 1909No. 193Published

Appeal from the District Court of Aguadilla. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OE

MR. JUSTICE MACLEARY.

Not being able to agree with 'my colleagues in their decision of this case, I respectfully present my reasons for dissenting.

This is a prosecution for the offense of exposing for sale adulterated milk. The language of the accusation, which was presented by the fiscal in the District Court of Aguadilla on June 10 of the present year, was literally as follows:

• “The fiscal files an information against Rosendo Ferraris, for an offense against public health, committed as follows: Said Rosendo Ferraris at Aguadilla, within this judicial district, one day…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. People v. . KiblerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Camden v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API