Legal Opinion

People v. Beaman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Special Term, Monroe County. Charles A. Beaman was convicted of selling adulterated milk, and appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.

The learned county judge, in a carefully prepared and very complete opinion, has set forth the reasons which led him to an .affirmance- of defendant’s conviction, and we agree with him in the conclusion reached in favor of such affirmance.

The defendant was a producer and peddler of milk in the city of Rochester. May 23, 1903, two inspectors of the health department of said city took samples from the peddling can from which he was then supplying customers, and also from two other cans upon his wagon. The samples were so taken after the milk had been fully stirred, in duplicate, one being given…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. . KiblerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People v. . CipperlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Hoffman v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. People v. HodnettNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. People v. LaesserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. McDermott Dairy Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API