Augustin v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The testimony recited above is sufficient to show the conflict presented by the evidence. The issues as to the negligence of the motorman and of Frank Augustin were properly for the jury and there is ample evidence to sustain the jury’s findings thereon.
The principal question involved in this appeal is whether the verdict returned by the jury is sufficient to sustain a judgment. The appellant Transport Company bases its appeal upon the contention that the verdict was complete as to said company and the trial court should have granted its motion for judgment on the verdict dismissing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haase v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Biersach v. WechselbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Will v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Geyer v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Scipior v. SheaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Giese v. Montgomery Ward, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Fleischhacker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Nommensen v. American Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- Anderson v. DeerwesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.