Legal Opinion

Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Molette

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1922No. 6 Div. 626PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

There was no error in sustaining the demurrer to defendant’s plea of contributory negligence numbered 11. The plea is defective in its statement of the facts. The allegation that plaintiff was laughing and talking with two negro women on his truck is an allegation of evidential fact, not the legal equivalent of an allegation that plaintiff drove upon the track without looking and listening as due care required that he should do. The gist of the plea is that plaintiff heedlessly or thoughtlessly drove upon the track. This was the allegation of a mere conclusion without sufficient supporting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Cook v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Allen v. SchultzWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Dickinson v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  5. Porter v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Buckley v. FrankelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Feore v. TrammelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Williams v. Roche Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Louisville N. R. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API