Legal Opinion

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Davis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 17, 1938No. 6 Div. 140PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

This action is under our homicide statute (section 5696, Code 1923), and no question presented on former appeal is of controlling interest here. Davis v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 232 Ala. 382, 168 So. 449.

Under plaintiff’s theory of the case her intestate was struck and killed by defendant’s train at a public street crossing in the city of Bessemer between 11:30 and 12 o’clock at night.

Defendants insist it was not known decedent was struck by the train, but, if so, it was not at the crossing but some dis tance north of the crossing, and offered much proof to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac R. Co. v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Kennedy v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. L. & N. R. R. v. CalvertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Manistee Mill Co. v. HobdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. McKinnon v. PolkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Roan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Arkel Land Co. v. CagleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API