Legal Opinion

United States v. Wayne R. Cooper and Vincent Gammill

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1993No. 91-10380PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Because of the government’s bad faith actions, the laboratory equipment seized from Apotheosis Research lies broken and buried in a toxic waste dump. This equipment cannot be introduced at trial. It can neither support nor undermine Wayne Cooper and Vincent Gammill’s repeated assertion that their lab lacked the physical capability to manufacture methamphetamine.

We consider here whether Cooper and Gammill have a comparable, alternative means to support their assertion of innocence. We conclude that no alternative matches the potentially powerful exculpatory evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Donald Paradis v. A.J. Arave, Warden, Idaho State Penitentiary Al Murphy, Director, Idaho State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. McCarty v. GilchristCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Eric Lee JobsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. FlyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. George L. Bohl, United States of America v. Richard R. BellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Pena v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API