Legal Opinion
Mortara v. CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 17, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
811 A.2d 404 (2002)
174 N.J. 566
Sarah J. MORTARA and Angelo J. Mortara, her husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 26, 2002.
Decided April 17, 2002.
Michael L. Testa, Vineland, argued the cause for appellants (Basile & Testa, attorneys; Walter A. Schultz, Jr., on the brief).
Gerard W. Quinn, Atlantic City, argued the cause for respondent Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Cooper Perskie April Niedelman Wagenheim & Levenson, attorneys).
Salvatore A.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reck v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Mortara v. Cigna Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Mortara v. Cigna Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Price v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010