Legal Opinion
Mortara v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 17, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 356 N.J.Super. 1, 811 A.2d 458 (2001).
For affirming — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI — 6.
Opposed — None.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mortara v. Cigna Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mortara v. CIGNA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002