Legal Opinion

Reck v. Director, Division of Taxation

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 19, 2002PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Stern’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 345 N.J.Super. 443, 785 A.2d 476 (2001).

LONG and VERNIERO, JJ., dissenting.

We would reverse the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Tax Court. Reck v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 18 N.J.Tax 598 (Tax 2000).

For affirming — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN — 5. For reversing — Justices LONG and YERNIERO — 2.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reck v. Director, Div. of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  2. Reck v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2000

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McGee v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST AMWELLNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  2. Waksal v. DirectorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. In re J.S.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  4. Mortara v. Cigna Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  5. Disabilities Resource Center v. Somers Pt.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API