Reck v. Director, Division of Taxation
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Stern’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 345 N.J.Super. 443, 785 A.2d 476 (2001).
LONG and VERNIERO, JJ., dissenting.
We would reverse the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Tax Court. Reck v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 18 N.J.Tax 598 (Tax 2000).
For affirming — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN — 5. For reversing — Justices LONG and YERNIERO — 2.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reck v. Director, Div. of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Reck v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2000
3Cited by16 opinions
- McGee v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST AMWELLNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Waksal v. DirectorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- In re J.S.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Mortara v. Cigna Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Disabilities Resource Center v. Somers Pt.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.