Seibert v. United States Ex Rel. Harshman
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field
^ The facts of this case are similar to those in Seibert v. Lewis, before the court at its October term, 1886, 122 U. S. 284, and it is admitted-by the counsel for the plaintiff in error that the decision there, if adhered to, will control here. He, however, as.ks us to reconsider our rulings and reverse our former judgment. We see no reason to justify such reconsideration and change of position. The very elaborate argument of counsel is but a re-presenta.tion of the reasons originally offered against the decision in that and analogous cases. Seibert v. Lewis was very carefully and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Seibert v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mississippi River Fuel Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Scott v. GossettIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- Jensen v. Reno Central Trades & Labor CouncilNevada Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. California Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Clark v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.