Legal Opinion

State v. California Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1953No. File 7317PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hutchinson, District Judge.

This action wms brought for the purpose of quieting title in Ward and Bottineau Counties in and to fifty per cent of the oil, natural gas, and minerals found on or underlying lands acquired by such counties by tax proceedings or otherwdse and which lands have been or may be resold. The issue is whether this court should overrule and set aside its decisions in the following cases:

Adams County v. Smith, 74 ND 621, 23 NW2d 873;

Kershaw v. Burleigh County, 77 ND 932, 47 NW2d 132;

Kopplin v. Burleigh County, 77 ND 942, 47 NW2d 137.

The suit was tried to the court without a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Adams County v. Smith and Dakota Collieries Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Kopplin v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Horton v. Wright, Barrett, & Stilwell Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Kershaw v. BRULEIGH COUNTYNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stracka v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Board of Education of Presque Isle Township School District No. 8 v. Presque Isle County Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Rausch v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. United States v. McKenzie CountyDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1960
  5. Steen v. FayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API