Legal Opinion
Zorn v. Smith
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 4, 2011No. 2009-035Published
1Opinion of the Court
19 A.3d 112 (2011)
2011 VT 10
Robert E. ZORN
v.
S. Scott SMITH.
No. 09-035.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
February 4, 2011.
Robert E. Zorn, Pro Se, Middletown Springs, Plaintiff-Appellant.
S. Scott Smith, Pro Se, Rutland, Defendant-Appellee.
Present: DOOLEY, JOHNSON and BURGESS, JJ., and CRAWFORD, Supr. J. and COOK, D.J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.
BURGESS, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiff Robert E. Zorn appeals pro se from an order prohibiting him from filing any additional documents with the Rutland Superior Court clerk except through a licensed attorney. We affirm the trial court's order except in two respects. First,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- De Long v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.