Legal Opinion

People v. Bottger

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1983No. Crim. 5905PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOOLPERT, J.

The importance of formula jury instructions becomes most obvious when there are none applicable to the principal issue in a criminal case. Because counsel and the court must innovate, the resulting instructions ensure a technical review on appeal. This is such an appeal. The editors of California Jury Instructions, Criminal (CALJIC) have not yet offered instructions and use notes on soliciting the commission of certain felonies.

Defendant John L. Bottger was convicted by a jury of solicitation for murder. (Pen. Code, § 653f, subd. (b).) On this appeal he urges there were two…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. SatchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. LoustaunauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API