Legal Opinion

Sidhu v. Shigo

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 10, 1984No. 329, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

Appellants Rajindar and Jagjeet Sidhu contracted to purchase certain improved real property in Anne Arundel County from appellees John and Ruth Shigo. The principal question before us is whether that contract was subject to the Maryland Land Installment Contract Act. Md.Real Prop.Code Ann. §§ 10-101 — 110 (1981 Repl.Vol.). If it was, since the contract concededly did not comply with certain of the protective provisions of the Act, appellants were entitled to avoid the contract and to recover all payments made under it. The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County (Heise, J.)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Webster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Shoreham Developers, Inc. v. Randolph Hills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. In Re Arnold M.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Hudson v. Maryland State Housing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  5. Spruell v. BlytheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Long v. BursonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Alamria v. Telcor International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  3. Baker DC, LLC v. Baggette Constr., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  4. Whitaker v. WhitakerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API