State v. Harrison
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — Hon. B. W. Preston, Judge. Suits in equity to enjoin alleged liquor nuisances. Nine eases were brought against as many or more defendants, and, upon appeal, they have been consolidated and submitted as one. In the district court, the petitions were dismissed, and the State appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
Certain statements of general consent to the sale of intoxicating liquors in the city of Oskaloosa, under the so-called “Mulct Law,” were canvassed by the board of supervisors of Mahaska county on December 26, 1910, and by that board held insufficient. Proper parties prosecuted an appeal to the district court of Mahaska county; and, upon a hearing there, the court found the statements sufficient. The decree so finding was entered on the 7th day of April, 1911. Appeal was taken to* this court, and on February 13, 1912, an opinion was filed reversing the finding of the district court and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Watson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Lindsay v. Clayton District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Phillips v. GermonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- DeBoard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Kelley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shaw v. AddisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Halloran v. Jacob Schmidt Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- State v. SeipesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Barber v. Buonanni Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Davidson v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks, No. 374Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.