Legal Opinion

Barber v. Buonanni Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 13, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Polh District Court. — Hubert Utterback, Judge. Action in equity to enjoin an alleged liquor nuisance. There was a decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. — ■

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Defendants operate a candy store and sell soft drinks, cider and pop. The trial court in its opinion found and stated that defendant made sale of cider as a beverage, contrary to law; that he offered testimony tending to show good faith, which plea of good faith the court was not disposed to accept, because, among other reasons, the cider contained such a large percentage of alcohol.

It appears without dispute that, on September 28, 1915, one Tuttle purchased cider in defendants’ place of business; that it was first placed in a jar and afterwards transferred into a bottle; that, at 10: 30 the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Judge v. KribsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. State v. KnappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Donnelly v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Tuttle v. BuntingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Danner v. HotzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. State v. FraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Martin v. State Ex Rel. EidsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. State v. SeipesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API