Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Clayton District Court

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1888PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Certiorari to Clayton District Court. This is an original proceeding in this court, the object of which is to review the action of the district court, refusing to punish one Hagensick for contempt in disobeying an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, C. J.

— The plaintiff commenced an action against J. L. Hagensick, and in May, 1887, a perpetual injunction was granted, restraining said Hagensick from manufacturing or selling intoxicating liquors, and ordering the abatement of the nuisance which the court found existed. Upon the day subsequent to the rendition of the decree the defendant in said action appealed to this court, and filed a supersedeas bond, as provided by law. Afterwards, at a subsequent term of court, the plaintiff filed a motion for a rule requiring the defendant to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt, on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central Union Telephone Co. v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Jayne v. DrorbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  3. First Congregational Church v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
  4. State ex rel. Matthews v. ChaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Shaw v. AddisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Watson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Thompson v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. Jones v. MouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API